Student out to give tow rules the boot
7 months ago | 2263 views | 6 6 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
By Ray Gronberg

gronberg@heraldsun.com; 419-6648

DURHAM -- A Duke University law school student is pushing City Council members to beef up regulations affecting how tow companies operate, particularly about how they handle tows from private parking lots.

The student, Carmen Jo Ponce, says Durham's rules offer less protection to residents and visitors against so-called "predatory towing" practices than the laws of neighboring Raleigh and Chapel Hill.

Ponce said her introduction to Durham after coming here for school in 2008 "was not the warmest welcome I've ever had to a city," thanks to an encounter with a tower that cost her $150. Her car got "booted" in a private lot while she and friends were eating at a restaurant off Guess Road.

Her call for additional restrictions on towing companies has some support among elected officials, most vocally from Councilman Eugene Brown.

"There is definitely, at least in my judgment, action that can or should be taken," Brown said.

But council members agreed late last year that the city's towing committee should study the matter first. The panel, chaired by Councilman Howard Clement, has yet to take up the debate.

Clement said Wednesday he's trying to schedule a meeting at a time when Ponce can attend. He also expects to hear from Durham Police Department officials, and from towing company representatives who usually provide "a big crowd at these hearings."

The phrase "predatory towing" usually is meant as criticism of the practice of allowing tow operators to remove cars from private lots, mostly at night, in lieu of large cash payments for their release.

Complaints most often center on towers' practice of hovering near lots to watch for potential targets, their unwillingness to release vehicles from a tow without some payment, and the failure of some lot owners to post warning signs on their property.

Durham law in theory caps the charge for a tow at $125, but Ponce notes that the city allows companies to lard the bill with extra charges.

They include an immediate $25 storage fee, a $21.25 "unusual circumstances" fee for any tow that takes more than half an hour to complete, and a $35 fee for releasing cars after normal business hours.

Raleigh and Chapel Hill, by contrast, cap the towing charge at $100 and bar companies for charging for storage in the first 24 hours after a haul.

Also, unlike Durham, they require companies to release a vehicle for $50 if the owner returns to the scene before it's been hauled off. Both also require tow drivers to accept credit and debit cards.

Raleigh additionally requires towers to have someone on call 24 hours a day to release cars, and to allow vehicle owners to remove personal property from their cars and trucks without charge.

Charlotte and Asheville have similar but not identical restrictions.

Asheville's City Council passed that city's towing rules last spring, following complaints from visitors and a December 2008 incident where police arrested a pair of tow drivers for hauling off a car that was legally parked.

Those arrests were actually the product of a sting, as Asheville police paid $3 to park the car in a lot and then watched it until the towers arrived, hooked it up and hauled it away. The men were charged with obtaining property by false pretenses.

The minutes of the Asheville City Council debate on that city's rules indicate that some officials were worried tow operators there were paying kickbacks to parking-lot owners.

An Asheville state legislator, Senate Majority Leader Martin Nesbitt, D-Buncombe, has proposed a statewide, $75 cap on the fee towers can charge for hauling a vehicle without its owner's consent.
comments (6)
« JackStraw wrote on Saturday, Jan 30 at 12:28 AM »
I had this happen to me at the same place. Its the restaurant next to the scooter store on Guess rd.
report abuse
« Ponce wrote on Friday, Jan 29 at 08:56 PM »
Hi, this is Carmen Jo Ponce. I just want to clarify one thing that was not clear in the article. When I was towed, the restaurant I was patronizing was in a strip-mall area. The parking lot was on the side of the establishment. There was no visible sign that the lot was private or a tow away zone. I only noticed the tiny sign staked in the ground, conveniently placed in a dark corner of the lot, when the tower physically took me to the sign. Furthermore, the sign was angled in such a way that it could not be read when entering the lot or when parking a vehicle. I had gone back out to the parking lot before the tower had finished putting the boot in place. While begging him to stop and promising to move my car, he put the boot over my tire and locked it.

Another thing I want to make clear, I did not take on this issue because of a feeling of entitlement to park where ever I want. My experience spurred me to look at Durham's towing regulations and those in other cities because I felt that it was unjust for private lot owners to inadequately or "strategically" place no-parking signs where a driver would not realize he was in a no parking zone. It is even more unjust for tow companies to take advantage of these unsuspecting drivers. Tow companies know that once they have your car, you are at their mercy. Durham is not a city where one can easily get around without a car. The man who booted my car that night said that if I could not pay him $150 right then that he would come back in 2 hours to tow the car and the charge would increase to $175. My friend had to walk to a gas station by himself to make a withdrawal from the ATM in order to pay the tower. I do not think that people should be taken advantage of in this way.

Other cities in North Carolina have had similar problems with predatory towing. However, these local governments have been responsive to their constituents' complaints and pleas for protection. These cities established very specific requirements for signs that indicating the lot is private. They also set caps on the amounts tow companies are allowed to charge (about $100), this way they cannot threaten to charge more if you can't pay on the spot. Several also have lower fees boots and storage. These cities also require towers to release the vehicle if the owner returns before it is towed. I see no reason why the Durham City Government should not also take steps to protect its constituents from the wide discretion of predatory towers.

If anyone would like to join my efforts or share your own towing story, please respond to this post.
report abuse
« BearTags wrote on Friday, Jan 29 at 10:24 AM »
What restaurant was Ponce at, and why doesn't it have adequate parking?

Although the fines and fees are a bit out of hand, everyone should park legally - even dookies.

report abuse
« mikebull wrote on Thursday, Jan 28 at 12:30 PM »
It's good to see this issue finally gaining momentum. I hope City Council is watching. I had a similar encounter with a local towing company when I ordered takeout from a local restaurant. Pulled up to a parking lot on the side of the building where the restaurant was located. Noticed a man booting a car in the parking lot. Worried, about getting a boot myself, I asked if this was the correct parking for the restaurant and he said, yes. I went about my business and five minutes later returned to my car being booted. No man in sight. The upshot; I was charged, in CASH only, $150 to remove the boot, plus $25 processing fee, plus $35 after hours fee. That was the most expensive take-out I've ever ordered. It was an honest mistake that ANYONE could have made, not to mention being lied to by the Chandler guy. That was a week's pay for me.
report abuse
« KillMoreTrees wrote on Thursday, Jan 28 at 08:55 AM »
I say that we allow tow companies to just automatically crush the vehicle where it sits...that'll teach em.
report abuse
« pacfandave wrote on Thursday, Jan 28 at 07:25 AM »
First, Ms Ponce parks her car where it has no leave to be parked. Not surprisingly, it was towed. Upset, with no logical reason to be upset, she wants tow companies to stop towing parking violators--in other words, she wants to be able to park anywhere she wants, whenever she wants, without fear of being towed. What is really beyond the pale is the city council chair trying to schedule a council meeting at her convenience! Cue the Twilight Zone music, here. Here's the solution, Carmen Jo. Park where you're allowed! You're just one example of why lawyers are in such disrepute.
report abuse