Nov. 21, 2009
3 months ago | 681 views | 5 5 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Nonsense abundant in insurance debate

The health care reform issue has raised an abundance of nonsense.

For example, it is interesting to see people demonstrating that we need to keep the government out of health care, but they are entirely happy with Medicare.

Some people are strongly against the government coming between them and their doctor but are happy with an insurance company employee making decisions on whether or not to pay for their doctor-recommended procedure.

I also love the comment "I refuse to pay for the health care costs of the uninsured." Why do you think hospital costs and doctors fees are so incredibly expensive? You are already paying for the uninsured.

People say that they want to keep the insurance company they currently have but if you have a company-provided health care plan, you did not select that insurance company.

Some people say the cost of health care reform is going to bankrupt this country. Health care is already bankrupting this country. This is why there are so many individuals in medical bankruptcy.

I also love the term "free medical care." There is no such thing. Medical costs must be paid by someone. The only hope is to reduce medical costs where possible and spread the rest of the costs over as many people as possible through universal health care insurance.

I suppose this is socialism but so are Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, the police department, the fire department, schools and all other social services.

JAMES CLARK

Durham

Some majority

I am amazed at all the letter submitters touting their devotion and praise on David Price for voting for Nancy Pelosi's health care bill.

I am reminded of the pied piper. Legend tells us he led all the rats of the town to the Weser River, where they all followed and fell into the river and died.

David Price, along with Bob Ethridge, Mel Watt, Brad Miller and C.K.Butterfield should be ashamed to face the people of North Carolina, for following Pelosi to the jumping-off point. NC has 13 representatives.

Of those 13, five Democrats voted yes, three Democrats voted no, along with all five Republicans, meaning 62 percent of our representatives analyzed this health care bill for themselves, rather than following pied piper Pelosi.

Do we need health reform? Yes, we certainly do, but not this bill. There are too many working poor who live from paycheck to paycheck, if they even have a job. Most people realize how extremely expensive this health bill is, and how destructive to our nation.

When the Republicans passed the prescription bill for seniors, they gave the option of buying that insurance or not. It was our decision. But H.R. 3962 makes it mandatory, no choice, to buy insurance or be fined a large amount.

Joseph Garner (11/11/09) called this bill "bipartisan majority". This bipartisan bill passed with 219 Democrats and one Republican. Very bipartisan! The majority was 220 of 438 members -- majority of 2 people! Wow, impressive!

LOUISE RIGSBEE

Durham
comments (5)
« leemoe wrote on Sunday, Nov 22 at 11:25 PM »
This country is already bankrupt and our present administration did not take us there. You had no problems with uncontrollable spending with the last administration now all of a sudden you are concern about what the costs are. I guess it's all about what party is telling us when it's okay to overspend. Don't like health care reform. Too bad but at least be original in your arguments and stop this dump repetition of the tired old lies. Oh my bad-- if a Repub say it it must be true.
report abuse
« JonL wrote on Sunday, Nov 22 at 03:27 PM »
I want to see the way we do health care change totally.

There isn't anything wrong with the health care e get. The problem is that it is run totally by insurance companies and pharmacutical companies, not the health care industry.

Why shoud we change it?

My mom was denied access to health care that would have detected her lymphoma in time to have saved her life because she had no insurance. She was denied because of other (non life threatening) health issues.

As things stand now, the rich get care, the poor go to their grave.

Who is more important, the idealists who want less government involvement or the living people who are at risk?

I know where I stand, do you?

If it was your mom, what would you do?

I'm fighting for change. ANY change is better than what we have now.
report abuse
« mab123 wrote on Saturday, Nov 21 at 10:50 PM »
I would rather have someone "do nothing" then "do something" that most Americans don't want. The one thing they did want was tort reform..oh yeah, can't have that, lawyers give too much money to the democratic party. I would also rather be a follower of fox news then a liberal who blindly goes along with a particular party no matter how detrimental it may be to our country. Bottom line: Both parties are out of touch with the American people. Washington has become so arrogant, uncaring and unethical that they cannot see (or choose not to) what is going on under their own eyes. I say vote them all out and take our country back!
report abuse
« mab123 wrote on Saturday, Nov 21 at 10:39 PM »
report abuse
« doelcam wrote on Friday, Nov 20 at 02:50 PM »
Louise, Perhaps the bill you would have preferred would have been introduced back in May, before the do-nothing Republicans dragged the process out. As far as the Pied Piper, you sound like a follower (rat) of Fox News (Pied Piper). You should know that there are no cheerleaders for Obama and Democratic congress. We're pissed. So, no we are not rats.
report abuse