Who approved $59K in overtime?
6 months ago | 4359 views | 29 29 comments | 59 59 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Bonfield's probe likely will extend into next week

By Ray Gronberg

gronberg@heraldsun.com; 419-6648

DURHAM -- Auditors checking into why a Durham Police Department desk officer received $59,454 in overtime in the last year are looking into who might have authorized the payments, among other questions, City Manager Tom Bonfield said.

The probe, undertaken at Bonfield's order, appears unlikely to be finished this week. Bonfield said auditors have to check months' worth of records, and near the end of the process give the Police Department a chance to respond to their findings.

The manager confirmed Thursday that he selected the Audit Services Department to conduct the probe, rather than the Police Department's internal affairs unit, to assure independence.

"Because this had and has the potential to go substantially through the ranks of the Police Department in terms of who signed off on what and did what, I felt it absolutely essential it be handled independently," he said, adding that the necessary paperwork review also plays to Audit Services' strengths.

Bonfield will meet with the auditors today to receive a progress report.

The probe began earlier this month after a citizens' complaint helped tip administrators at City Hall to the fact that Officer Alesha Robinson-Taylor had received more in overtime last year than she earned in regular pay. As of May 13, her salary was listed at $51,220 a year.

The dollar figure is for the period Sept. 1, 2008, to Aug. 31, 2009, and is for 1,750.5 hours worth of work. That's the equivalent of 33.7 hours' extra work for each week of the year.

One of Bonfield's deputy managers, Wanda Page, said earlier this week that it's at the very least "unusual that one officer would be awarded that amount of overtime or would be required to work that amount of hours."

The next-largest overtime claim in that time was from an officer who recorded 438 hours of extra time.

Robinson-Taylor works in the Police Department's Operations Bureau and oversees towing and the "secondary employment" -- also known as the moonlighting -- of her fellow officers.

She answers within the Police Department to a short and unusually top-heavy chain of command. As of this week, it runs through the Operations Bureau's executive officer, Capt. Charlene Balch, to Deputy Police Chief Beverly Council and Police Chief Jose Lopez.

But Balch wasn't Robinson-Taylor's superior during at least part of the year.

Her predecessor as operations executive officer was former Capt. Ron Evans, police spokeswoman Kammie Michael said, adding late Thursday that she didn't have a specific date for when Balch took over.

The auditors are "looking all the way up to see what signoffs occurred, if signoffs occurred," Bonfield said. "They were directed to look not just at all the justifications, but just who signed off on it, which would have had to have happened for the payroll to be processed."

The manager's approach to the investigation drew praise Thursday from the leader of the N.C. Sheriff Police Alliance, former Durham Police Department Capt. Andy Miller.

Miller said Bonfield had made "absolutely the right call" in having someone outside the department handle the investigation. "We think it's a serious enough issue that it deserves transparency, and the city manager obvious agrees with us," he said.

Miller -- who's now a lieutenant with N.C. Central University's campus police -- said he and other members of his group are interested in seeing what the records say and are reserving judgment until they do.

But "if it turns out to be anything other than a mistake, we'll be very concerned because somebody higher up had to sign off on that kind of overtime," he said.

In that event, "making the lowest person on the totem pole a scapegoat is not going to satisfy, I think, the citizens of this town," Miller added.

Bonfield pledged Thursday to make sure the investigation is done right.

"Rest assured it will be thorough, it will be complete and it will be transparent," he said.
comments (29)
« Rachel Kindred wrote on Sunday, Sep 27 at 09:01 AM »
Actually, I'm a woman. That explains it better. But oranges are quite complicated pieces of fruit, so I like that analogy, too. Thanks for the compliment. Productive dialogue is so much better than name-calling, I think. Anywhooo...Call Lou Velasco, Agent in charge of Public Corruption at the FBI in Raleigh at 233-7701. The thing we know in Durham is that if oppression lasts for as long as it has in Durham, happens to cops, happens to the Duke Lacrosee boys, happens to me, happens to cops some more, then there is a systemic problem with regular peoples' access to justice in this town that can't be allowed to continue. I know it's happened to others, maybe you too. This is about the Constitution but all the lawsuits in the pipeline are going to bankrupt this town. Frankly, I think we deserve to go broke. Rebuild something meaningful from the ashes. Perhaps some of those damages can be mitigated by putting the blame right where it belongs: Bell, Woodard, Catotti, Brown, Cole-McFadden, Howard Clement, Patrick Baker, Ali, Stith, Blinder, Kitchen, Worth Hill, Hodge, Lopez, Council, and all of us who have stood by and watch it happen to someone else and not given one whit.
report abuse
« anonymous wrote on Sunday, Sep 27 at 08:51 AM »
report abuse
« betterthanyou wrote on Saturday, Sep 26 at 08:45 PM »
"I have more juice than you"

AHA, I knew it, you're not nuts, you're an orange. That explains it!
report abuse
« betterthanyou wrote on Saturday, Sep 26 at 08:42 PM »
"I have more juice than you"

HA! I knew it, you're not nuts, you're an orange. That explains it!
report abuse
« Rachel Kindred wrote on Friday, Sep 25 at 07:42 PM »
You have a mean little edge on you that is shared by many men in this town. A women speaks, fights, objects, protests, pushes back, exercises her rights as a citizen, knows who to call to protect herself and her family, and she is crazy and a should-be resident of a mental hospital. Notice how all the comments have to do with me being crazy and cerifiable rather than the issue of a police department scaring a protestor exercising her first amendment rights and the conspiracy to coverup publication of said violation by the men who run this town. If you know anything about violence against women, the most dangerous time is when a woman blows the whistle to someone more powerful than her oppressor and demands, not asks politely, but demands accountability. You think anonymous was benign, but he was not. I know this because I have more information than you. I have more connections than you. I have more juice than you. And I have more courage than you. I am a woman and I say no more to political violence in this town.
report abuse
« betterthanyou wrote on Friday, Sep 25 at 04:52 PM »
What are you going to report this person for? Knowing you? Good grief I think they ought to take your computer privileges away up at Umstead Hospital.
report abuse
« Rachel Kindred wrote on Thursday, Sep 24 at 09:36 PM »
OK, then, you dumb cluck anonymous. You are rported to the FBI.
report abuse
« Rachel Kindred wrote on Thursday, Sep 24 at 07:02 PM »
Why anonymous, that sounds like a threat on my family to me. You too much of a coward to identify yourself? You gonna send a stone cold killa over to my house and kill my elderly father? If you're a friend trying to give me a heads up, this aint the way to go about it. I suggest you email me posthaste at rachel_kindred @ yahoo dot com so we are not misunderstanindg each other.
report abuse
« anonymous wrote on Thursday, Sep 24 at 06:19 PM »
Please Rach, get a grip.

Say hello to Jeremy for me will you?
report abuse
« rachel3030 wrote on Thursday, Sep 24 at 04:11 PM »
Rachel Kindred says...Hey that's cool. the H-S deleted my reply response...so H-S, getting a little nervous, aren't ya? That's a good sign. I am deeply pleased. Identify yourself for the viewing public won't you, Anonymous?

report abuse
« rachel3030 wrote on Thursday, Sep 24 at 04:10 PM »
Rachel Kindred says...Hey that's cool. the H-S deleted my reply response...so H-S, getting a little nervous, aren't ya? That's a good sign. I am deeply pleased. Identify yourself for the viewing public won't you, Anonymous?

report abuse
« anonymous wrote on Thursday, Sep 24 at 10:25 AM »
Rachel- it's probably time you started taking your meds again.
report abuse
« rachel3030 wrote on Wednesday, Sep 23 at 08:35 AM »
The FBI agent's name in Raleigh is Lou Velasco at 2 3 3 - 7 7 0 1.
report abuse
« Rachel Kindred FBI wrote on Wednesday, Sep 23 at 08:34 AM »
I have not heard back from Hodge and Lopez about when would be a convenient time to go to the PD and do a citizen detention, so I just called the agent in charge of public corruption at the Raleigh office of the FBI at 2 3 3 - 7 7 0 1. Call him if you have anything to say.
report abuse
« Citizens Arrest wrote on Tuesday, Sep 22 at 07:14 PM »
I just want you all to know I sent an email to the 50 people on the cc list to make an appt with the FBI to make a citizens detention of Hodge and Lopez based on conspiracy to obstruct justice. email me at rachel_kindred @ yahoo dot com if you want to chat. I'll stick up for you, one citizen to another. Email and general statute below.

"I want to make a citizen's detention of Hodge and Lopez for conspiracy to obstruct justice..I got probable cause...NC Justice Academy says it's cool, statute below...FBI, who should I make an appt. with--I think you should go with me saince I intend to detain them at the Durham PD but I'm willing to go myself if you want...Lopez and Hodge, what time works for you?

§ 15A‑404. Detention of offenders by private persons.

(a) No Arrest; Detention Permitted. – No private person may arrest another person except as provided in G.S. 15A‑405. A private person may detain another person as provided in this section.

(b) When Detention Permitted. – A private person may detain another person when he has probable cause to believe that the person detained has committed in his presence:

(1) A felony,

(2) A breach of the peace,

(3) A crime involving physical injury to another person, or

(4) A crime involving theft or destruction of property.

(c) Manner of Detention. – The detention must be in a reasonable manner considering the offense involved and the circumstances of the detention.

(d) Period of Detention. – The detention may be no longer than the time required for the earliest of the following:

(1) The determination that no offense has been committed.

(2) Surrender of the person detained to a law‑enforcement officer as provided in subsection (e).

(e) Surrender to Officer. – A private person who detains another must immediately notify a law‑enforcement officer and must, unless he releases the person earlier as required by subsection (d), surrender the person detained to the law‑enforcement officer. (1973, c. 1286, s. 1.)

report abuse
« rachel3030 wrote on Tuesday, Sep 22 at 11:11 AM »
DID YOU KNOW? In summer of 2007, I picketed in the back of the PD to get Hodge out and Lopez in. On my very first day of picketing, Hodge came down and confronted me. I was scared to death but kept on picketing. I asked the PD command, the entire city government, including Patrick Baker (then City Mngr now City Atty) for picket permit and use of force procedures because I was afraid I was going to get beat up or arrested on a pretext. Noone would tell me anything until after my 4 day protest was over and by then I was scared to death. They absolutely did it on purpose to make me afraid, and they succeeded. I'm still afraid 2 and ahalf years later. The kicker is that I bcc:d Lopez even before he came to Durham so he would make things right when he came to Durham. Lopez' first official act as Police Chief was a coverup of what happened to me. for two and a half years, I have sought justice but noone would listen. What you don't know is that I filed for Lopez and Hodge to get decertified for blatantly violating my constitutional rights about a week ago. Have you heard? No! Everybody knows! Lopez? Justice? Hah! Lopez? Constitution? Ha! Lopez and the departmental cleanup? Triple ha. I ratted out Patrick Baker, the City Council, the County Commissioner, the County attorneys, the Sheriff, the bar, the Governor, the AGs office, the Crime Commissioner, to the FBI and the DOJ. Ha! Didn't know that did you?

I WANT A DETERMIANTION OF PROBABLE CAUSE ON EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM FOR ENGAGING IN A CONSPIRACY TO PUT ME IN FEAR AND KEEP ME IN FEAR. Preferably under the Patriot Act...it sure feels like terror from the seat I'm sitting in. Bet there's lots of people in Durham who have felt the terror.

BUT NOTHING WILL HAPPEN UNTIL WE PUT ASIDE OUR FEAR AND STAND UP! Even the good guys have allowed the rot to continue by BEING AFRAID AND NOT SPEAKING.

If you have your own issue, email me at rachel_kindred at yahoo dot com, and I will send you the entire cc list so you can build your own case to turn over to the Feds.

My guess is that sooner rather than later all these political insiders are going to get caught up in the federal fishing net -- the universe of cronies is quite small in Durham and the records will tell the tale. Getting to the records is quite the challenge but I 100% promise you the records will be got and the net will close. As I have said, the idea that all this stuff began and ended with the Duke Lacrosse case is wrong. It went on ten years before and it still goes on today. But I also 100% promise you that this is going to stop with this generation. we've ruined the next generations' economy, healthcare, opportunities and whatever, but I will not allow the cronyism and coverups in Durham -- city and county -- with the enabling of the state to continue. By God, I can't fix the economy but I can defend the rule of law and the US Constitution. Each of us have the power to stop it but each of us must choose to not be afraid, or to be afraid and say what you know anyway. Even the good guys have enabled this rot to continue by their fear and their silence. Nows the time to stand for something, people.
report abuse
« motomoto wrote on Monday, Sep 21 at 11:04 PM »
Why are the taxpayers of Durham paying a salary and a lot of overtime for off duty work to be regulated and towing to be babysat?? Seems like maybe the city should be collecting all the off duty money and charging a fee to cover the costs of coordinating the off duty work. I also wonder how much time is spent on our dime coordinating and planning off duty jobs on the clock? Each job has a separate coordinator and I am sure they are doing all of the scheduling on their own time and not on ours, right? I am sure our police administration wouldn't be doing this or allow any of their staff to do this personal business on the clock? Especially personnel in professional standards. I think it would be fair to have a full disclosure of off duty work to include who is coordinating the jobs, how much money is being made and how many hours our officers are working. I know there has been an issue in the past of DPD staff working for the city and an off duty job at the same time. And when this came to light, there was no demotion or punishment for the individual involved under Chalmers. I wonder how closely this is really be tracked. I hope Chief Lopez has better control of his people than Chalmers did. It is disheartening that DPD's professional standards was not trusted with the investigation of 1 of its own. If this is the case, why do we have a professional standards division? I thought we had grown.
report abuse
« motomoto wrote on Monday, Sep 21 at 10:46 PM »
report abuse
« rachel3030 wrote on Monday, Sep 21 at 12:11 PM »
Might want to read the other article too. Some post duplications but also different posts, "Police officer paid $60K in overtime." "Another Incident"'s comments on that one were right on---ties between Cora and BJ, and of course Cora is with the NAACP, Howard too I think--anybody else have tidbits to add to the pot? Be sure the Feds are fact-gathering, anything is helpful...here's another one--from research I did, it looks like Hodge went thru a year of law school at Central, which means he took Constitutional law. Hugely significant to other civil rights claims--eg I hope the officer of FaceBookGate incident sues, too. His statute of limitations hasn't run and I know for a certain fact that what Lopez and Hodge and probably BJ decided was completely unconstitutional. And to the last post, I can absolutely guarantee the the PD junta both past and present quashes the Constitutional rights of everyone, regardless of color. All about da power, baby.
report abuse