- Business
- Local/State
- Nation/World
- Sports
- Top Stories
- Duke
- NCCU
- UNC
- NCSU
- College
- High School
- Canes
- Durham Bulls
- Pro Sports
- Golf
- Tennis
- Auto Racing
- Soccer
- Columnists
- Lifestyles
- Announcements
- Books
- Schools
- Health
- Food
- Faith
- Entertainment
- TV
- Columnists
- Special Sections
- Senior Times
City grants Duke request
By Ray Gronberg
gronberg@heraldsun.com; 419-6648
DURHAM -- City Council members voted 6-0 Monday to go along with Duke University's request that they surrender the public right of way under two streets near East Campus.
The decision came after Duke officials promised city officials and residents of the nearby Burch Avenue neighborhood that it would continue to allow the public to use Sumter Street and Maxwell Avenue 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
The university's pledge came in a site plan, approved by city officials over the summer, that shows the streets will remain un-gated even after the school finishes the renovation of the adjoining Smith Warehouse complex.
Duke officials have the right to file a new site plan at any time that would scrap the access promise, but city/county planners say they'll warn the City Council if the school tries that.
Council members noted, however, that a site-plan change doesn't require their approval.
"This is not the best possible outcome," Councilman Mike Woodard said, indicating that he was going along only because the school cut a deal with Burch Avenue residents.
Councilman Howard Clement also voiced doubts about the outcome.
"There's nothing binding in this arrangement," he said. "Frankly, I'm disappointed."
Monday's vote capped a debate that had gone on for more than nine months.
Burch Avenue residents had objected to the right-of-way abandonments because they feared Duke would block public use of the streets, which the neighbors say provide an important safety valve for motorists when trains block passage along nearby Buchanan Boulevard.
Duke's case wasn't helped this spring when the school's executive vice president, Tallman Trask, met with council members behind closed doors and told them the roads would be gated.
A Duke representative had previously told the council, in public, that the school would continue to allow access.
Council members pushed for additional negotiations between the school and the neighborhood. The ultimately successful talks were led from Duke's side by Vice President for Durham and Regional Affairs Phail Wynn.
Neighborhood leaders stand behind the resulting deal even though several residents remain "adamantly opposed" to the surrender of legally guaranteed access rights, Burch Avenue activist Mark Eckert said.
Old West Durham Neighborhood Association President John Schelp urged council members to be wary. Trask, he said, remains in place and behind the scenes "is deliberately undermining genuine efforts by the university to improve town-gown relations."
Council members indicated that they'd hold Duke administrators accountable for any backtracking.
"Let the word go forth that if there's any attempt to break the spirit of the content of your letter [outlining the deal's terms], then you will certainly hear about it from this council and you will hear about it from the citizens of these neighborhoods," Councilman Eugene Brown told Wynn.
The vote was 6-0 because Councilwoman Diane Catotti sat out the debate on the grounds her husband is the Duke administrator in charge of parking.


The neighborhoods were able to help Duke help itself become a better neighbor.
We all agree that the ball is in Duke's court. Time will tell if Duke stands by its word.
Neighbors have good reason to be wary...
On December 1st, Duke folks - working for Tallman Trask - testified to City Council that the university had no plans to block Maxwell Street.
Yet, Trask already had a 10-day old Site Plan on his desk -- a Site Plan showing three gates across Maxwell.
He knew. And he didn't try to set the record straight.
Trask hasn't hesitated to mislead "partnership" neighborhoods, other Duke administrators and elected officials. He is deliberately undermining genuine efforts at the university to improve town-gown relations. (Look no further than Duke demolishing the old mill village store on Central Campus, this past weekend.)
For an institution that's so worried about its image, one wonders why Trask is still calling the shots. Duke can do better. Much better.
John Hope Franklin said it best: "You can't have a high standard of scholarship without having a high standard of integrity, because the essence of scholarship is truth."
Endangered Durham (9/6/09):
"Duke tore down the most significant historic structure remaining in the western portion of the West Durham mill village last week - the Garden Street Store - in order to build a new faux-historic store on the spot. It appears that they are preparing to demolish at least one of the adjacent mill houses as well. The most bizarre aspect of this is that Duke assured members of the community several years ago that they would allow the community an opportunity to move the structures, and contribute a token amount towards the moving costs."
http://endangereddurham.blogspot.com/2009/09/superficial-sustainability-at-duke.html